Inwe have the M. I would like to begin by looking at a remark from the decision of Justice Pitfield on a B. There were clear distinctions of a society that is breaking down that correlated with the ways in which that society responded--for example, the no-cause type of divorce, the disrespect of children towards their parents, certain key items like that, that I can find in that report.
For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife and the two will become one flesh. It's a little bit confusing as to how this is going to work, because you would have to have agreements with all provinces and all territories.
The meaning and legal character of the word are not ambiguous. Typical heterosexISTIC schematization and mental self-gratification even when or if not outright admitted as such. I do think there will be a negative effect.